![Artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word](https://kumkoniak.com/32.jpg)
![artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word](https://batfasr143.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/5/7/125790522/460663936.jpg)
Jamal, son of late Kamal Mia, National Bank Ltd, Dilkusha Branch,48,Dilkusha Commercial Area, Dhaka-1000,aged about 42 years, occupation service, by faith Muslim, Nationality Bangladeshi, do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows: 1. SCHEDULE-1 Description of loan and amount outstanding Principle loan amount Interest other Expenses Outstanding 3, 00, 00, 000 50, 00, 000 - 3, 50, 00, 000 SCHEDULE-2 AFFIDAVIT I, Mr. (C) Costs of the suit (D) Any other relief entitled in law and equity. Wherefore the plaintiff most humbly pray before the honourable court: (A) A decree for sum of taka 3, 50, 00, 000 only interest calculated up to in favor of the plaintiff bank and against the defendant (B) A decree for pendent lite interest at the rate stipulated in the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003.
![artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word](https://lasopawisconsin663.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/5/6/125696658/797710597.png)
Jamal, who is aware of all facts, will represent the suit. An authorized representative of plaintiff Bank, Mr. The plaintiff bank has paid necessary court fees. The cause of action arose in Dhaka on when the bank sanctioned loan and served notice to defendant No: 2 on 10-12-14 to come forward and pay the loan. The present outstanding liability of the defendant No: 1 is taka 3, 50, 00, 000 up to. Legal notice was served on 10-12-14 to defendant No: 2 but he did not make any payment due to the bank. On 08-09-12, 03-07-13, 05-05-14 plaint vides series of letter to defendant No: 2 but defendant No: 2 was reluctant to pay the loan.ĭefendant No: 2 wanted to extend the time but after that willfully restrained from making any payment. Defendant No: 2 showed different excuses in paying the loan. The plaintiff bank verbally and in written informed defendant No: 2 but it was in vain.
![artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word](http://tutorsite270.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/3/9/123980715/574087543.jpg)
Defendant No:1 failed to repay the loan after the validity period expired on.
![artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word](http://leisuredwnload693.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/4/7/124790955/419320437.jpg)
For the security defendant No: 1 executed the following documents: a) Demand Promissory Note b) Letter of Continuity c) Letter of Hypothecation of bills. The account was opened for the sanction of 3, 00, 00,000 taka for executing the work order of the industry. 2 opened a bank account on behalf of defendant No.1 and the account No. The defendant No: 1 is a company incorporated under the relevant Companies Act, 1994 and is the proprietor of M/S Smart Industries. The plaintiff is a banking company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1994 and is situated at 192 Kataban Road, Police Station: Nilkhet in Dhaka and hereby will be known as the plaintiff bank. The above named plaintiff most respectfully: Sheweth: 1. Kamal Address: 112, Shegun Bagicha Police Station: Ramna District: Dhaka.Defendants SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY Suit valued at taka 3, 50, 00,000 upto 16-04-15. Police Station: Mirpur.ĭistrict: Dhaka 2. Name: Abdul Halim Proprietor of: M/S Smart Industries Address: 103, Mirpur, 11. IN THE COURT OF 2nd ARTHA RIN ADALAT AIN, DHAKA ARTHA RIN SUIT NO: 06 OF 2015 AB Bank Limited House No: 193 Kataban Road Police Station: Nilkhet District: Dhaka.Plaintiff - Versus- 1.
![Artha rin adalat ain 2003 bangladesh pdf to word](https://kumkoniak.com/32.jpg)